[文集] [专题] [检索] [独立评论] [海阔天空] [矛盾江湖] [全版论坛]

独立评论

作者: port   钟馗同志,有意和我联手去纽约律师协会投诉海明吗? 2011-05-15 17:55:40  [点击:1151]
如何给那种流氓一点儿颜色,是我今天饭后思考的首要问题。

以前我曾讲过,他到了法庭上,有可能被法官给骂出去甚至罚款。

但那样时间太久,而且很有可能立不了案子,他连个见到法官的机会都没有。就如同他起诉CNN一样,开头大造声势,过两天偷偷再撤诉。

如果咱能主动出击,就比较能解手痒。

我快速浏览了一下纽约律协的行为准则。发现海明的无耻下流行为触犯了至少两条规则:3.1 & 3.6(见下). 头一条是议论最集中的“乱咬人”。后一条,是他针对被告和网人的言论,明显是诋毁对方。

不知你是不是在这行里吃饭的。我一个蓝领肯定不是了。但我有朴素的无产阶级热心啊。

ZT



New York City Bar Association
RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT
RULE 3.1: NON-MERITORIOUS CLAIMS AND CONTENTIONS
(a) A lawyer shall not bring or defend a proceeding, or assert or controvert an issue therein, unless there is a basis in law and fact for doing so that is not frivolous. The advocate …also a duty not to abuse legal procedure.

The action is frivolous, however, if the action has no substantial purpose other than to harass or maliciously injure a person, or if the lawyer is unable either to make a good-faith argument on the merits of the action taken.

RULE 3.6: TRIAL PUBLICITY
(a) A lawyer who is participating in or has participated in a criminal or civil matter shall not make an extrajudicial statement that the lawyer knows or reasonably should know will be disseminated by means of public communication and will have a substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing an adjudicative proceeding in the matter.

(b) A statement ordinarily is likely to prejudice materially an adjudicative proceeding when it refers to a civil matter triable to a jury.. and the statement relates to:
(1) the character, credibility, reputation or criminal record of a party,

加跟贴

笔名:     新网友请先注册笔名 密码:
主题: 进文集
内容: